<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 name is now official</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2009/07/09/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-2-name-is-now-official.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2009/07/09/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-2-name-is-now-official.htm</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2009/07/09/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-2-name-is-now-official.htm/comment-page-1#comment-695292</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogamesblogger.com/?p=18684#comment-695292</guid>
		<description>i think just having modern warfare 2 would be better but i really dont think it matters 2 much</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think just having modern warfare 2 would be better but i really dont think it matters 2 much</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferry</title>
		<link>http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2009/07/09/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-2-name-is-now-official.htm/comment-page-1#comment-691498</link>
		<dc:creator>Ferry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogamesblogger.com/?p=18684#comment-691498</guid>
		<description>That was definitely the weirdest choice I&#039;ve seen a big publisher make in a while. You don&#039;t just throw away your multi-million dollar brand, you know.

I&#039;m glad it&#039;s back too. Because it&#039;s part of the main series, not a spin-off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was definitely the weirdest choice I&#8217;ve seen a big publisher make in a while. You don&#8217;t just throw away your multi-million dollar brand, you know.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad it&#8217;s back too. Because it&#8217;s part of the main series, not a spin-off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asif</title>
		<link>http://www.videogamesblogger.com/2009/07/09/call-of-duty-modern-warfare-2-name-is-now-official.htm/comment-page-1#comment-691243</link>
		<dc:creator>Asif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 13:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.videogamesblogger.com/?p=18684#comment-691243</guid>
		<description>yep, really nice to see the call of duty title back, its absence was bugging me a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yep, really nice to see the call of duty title back, its absence was bugging me a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

