1 July 2008
Ferry

GRAW 3 and Rainbow Six Vegas 3 secretly unveiled at Ubidays 2008?

Something you might’ve missed on the Ubidays 2008 event back on May 28th was the below “10 Years of Tom Clancy Games” trailer. Not only does it briefly show past games, it also touts hints at unannounced upcoming Tom Clancy games with the line: “The Future Will Be Explosive.” The CGI footage shows Rainbow Six: Vegas 3, GRAW 3 (Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 3), Splinter Cell (Conviction?), and HAWX (High Altitude Warfare Experimental Squadron).

After 10 years of best-selling games, what’s next? Watch this Tom Clancy trailer to see for yourself.

As part of Ubisoft’s earnings report a month ago, the developer mentioned it had a pair of unannounced sequels in existing franchises set for release by the end of March 2009.

With Ubisoft not having announced their E3 2008 lineup yet, could this be part of their unveilings come July 15?

2 July 2008 13:07
joe

actually i noticed a lot of those cg pieces were from both graw 1&2 and rainbow six 1&2 just trailers wise

7 July 2008 14:33
Bishop

YAYYYYYY

15 July 2008 06:48
Cwayne

Rainbow Six Vegas 3 is not true, Ubisoft Studio Montreal who made Rainbow Six Vegas 1 & Vegas 2, said that Vegas 2 will be the last Rainbow that will have a story in Las Vegas.

31 July 2008 10:51
Max

Since when does CGI footage from previous games prove that sequels will be made?

3 August 2008 02:56
Jonathan

im not really a big fan of GRAW i have 2 and its so complicated but Rainbow Six I love I really hope that next 1 has better graphics and the characters on multiplayer dont look all hump backes and odd shaped if that is fixed count me in i will buy it on the release date

4 August 2008 11:50
This Guy

There isn’t going to be a Vegas 3-The “Vegas” series is over. Whatever the next Rainbow Six is, it’ll be somewhere else, like Iran or something. And this trailer doesn’t imply a new Rainbow or GRAW- those are clips from the first and second of both.

26 August 2008 22:37
Barackuse

I can never understand why they did not make GRAW like RB6, the game play is completely diffrent

RB6 has set the bar for all first person shooters, after playing this one, I find it hard to pick up any other

30 August 2008 18:09
Sermoneous

I personally think RB6 sucked! I played bothe of the Vegas game and I dont think they lived up to the tactical edge Ubisoft has created with th GR series in my mind the GR series was the obvious winner between the two. The multiplayer community for GR is a more respectable mature community as to the RB6 adolesent ill kick your *ss over the internet state of mind I dont know about everybody els but I sure as hell dont like being told to f*ck off by kid not even old enough to purchase the game

2 September 2008 14:44
Jason

If GRAW was more like RB6 (first person w/3rd person wall hugs), then I would be more inclined to play it. I just can’t get into a game with a constant 3rd person view.

29 September 2008 10:46
Albert

Actually I preferred GRAW to RB6. People who whine about how GRAW should be more like RB6 please shut up. The reason why there are 2 lines of products means they cater to different crowd. GRAW is a lot more tactical giving you full control of the team. how to move, how to lay down covering fire. How to use the element of surprise. If you play it like a run and shoot like DOOM, you will get plastered every time.