Call of Duty 4 with modern war setting in development

14 November 2006
Posted by:

Call of Duty 2Call of Duty 3 is barely out the door and a Ampednews source has already revealed Call of Duty 4 is in development at Infinity Ward, the development team behind the first two Call of Duty games. Listed are the first details:

* Call of Duty 4 will be coming to the PC as well as consoles. Where as Call of Duty 3 is only available on consoles, as well as the PSP.
* It will be based on modern combat, taking place on the battlefields of present day Middle East.
* While most shooters have two or three critical points on the head, Call of Duty 4 has 16. You can shoot the side of an opponent’s helmet to make it spin on their head, or knock the helmet clean off. Supposedly you will even be able to shoot an enemy’s ear off.
* Multiplayer features matches with 54 players.

While this info seems very plausible, according to Xboxic, Activision declined to confirm or deny its authenticity.

Some more details: In Call of Duty: Modern Warfare you’ll serve as part of the U.S. Army, U.S. Marines, and British S.A.S. to take on terrorists loyal to an aggressive Middle Eastern dictator. This war on terror must be fought all over the world — in locations as diverse as vessels at sea in the North Atlantic, secret terrorist cells in London, the urban streets of Eastern Europe, and, of course, the Middle East — as you try to stop a terrorist coalition from using its deadly chemical arsenal.

As a pilot in an Army attack helicopter, you’ll fly over cratered urban environments — with rocket-propelled grenades to boot — before you rope down as part of a Marine platoon to engage in close-quarters combat in a very different sort of environment from Call of Duty 2. It’s in this door-to-door implementation of battle that similarities to Rainbow Six 3 and Splinter Cell start to become apparent as you fight in squads, rappel down walls, and clear rooms with silenced guns, tear gas, flashbangs, and various specialized goggles. That doesn’t prevent you from utilizing all manner of authentic modern weaponry, however, including automatic grenade launchers, mines, and machine guns.

Modern Warfare will also feature deformable environments, where you can kick down and blow up doors, or take it to another next level with destructible walls, roads, buildings, and bridges. You’ll also be able to block doors with heavy obstacles like vehicles or furniture and block windows from grenades with a little chicken wire. But you’re not just limited to shooting what’s within your firearm’s reach: you can call in and laser-sight air strikes to knock out those pesky enemy tanks and sniper’s nests, too.

The first trailer for the PC, PS3 & Xbox 360 game:

Categories: News, Videos

  • Pingback: Call of Duty 4 revealed! - Emuforums.com

  • chip j

    I think this is Activision’s attempt to match its competitor EA Games, and it’s popular BF2 series. THose servers are split now into infantry and fullly mechanized maps. I think they wanted an offering in the modern-day combat games and this is it. I’m looking forward to it.

  • banman

    why move to modern combat? there is still a whole pacific front to fight, also the multiplayer will never be the same, the ww2 is the best because of weapon limitation what i mean is the ww2 weapons are far more fun, ad flamethrowers and make the weapons jam it happened often in the war, also make all the weapons available in multiplayer (no fg42 for online really burned me) also make more apparent the lack of armor the sherman had more apparent. just to much left to do in ww2 for c.o.d. to move on i think. plus it would be imppossible know about all of the modern combat weapons so we could ever be able to know the true authenticity. add some real tank battles i mean like the battle of the bulge. i would love to see them atleast give us a game that puts us through the pacific tour then gradualy brings us to the end of the war and eventualy a cool screen shots of the 2 atomic bombs goin off. i mean thats an ending. then move on to more resent wars. unless they do that someone will always say they should have stuck with ww2
    oh yea bigger online games massive maps, 50 on 50 would be nice to

  • Philly

    NO MODERN COMBAT!!!! i think that cod4 should be set in the near end of WW2. like wen the allies go into germany

  • James

    Call Of Duty 4 Sounds Wicked Sick But They Based It on Modern Day To Fast. I Likeded It When It Was Back In World War 2 Just Like Call Of Duty 3. They Should Base It Back To World War 2 Instead.

  • mark

    if the developers or anyone sees this

    modern warefare is a great idea, like lazer guided bombs and stuff that’d b cool and some cool sniping stuff, and like ROE and stuff where enemies run away and drop weapons and act like civilians and escorting convoys which frequently stop in enemy towns and the like

    also a vietnam game would be awesome lots of potenial there and an Asia campaign for WW2 like MOH:PA the medics there were a great idea along with the health system.

    i would buy any of these types

  • mark

    or a nazi campaign or something like role reversal

    maybe more bastogne type levels i think MOH has some great ideas for battles

  • Lincoln

    Why in the modern Middle-East?
    Nobody gives a shit about Iraq and the Palastines and so on . . .

    There are still so many great options for WWII.
    Like the Eastern Front or the Pacific.

  • Vitamin-J

    I think the move to modern day warfare is brilliant! Tell me you guys arn’t tired of WWII yet? That age has been produced over hundreds of times again and again – It’s about time COD moved on.

    I did not purchase COD2 as it was no different than the first (Age wise). I and many others will move back or for the first time into COD4 because of it’s now modern day appeal.

  • http://poetrypoem.com/napo Napoleon Van Hardridge

    Hey I just seen the trailer, and it seems like it’s going to be a damn good game … time will tell though ….


  • Recent Comments

  • Play Mass Effect 3′s Demo Right Now!

  • Archives